Hi guys welcome back to my Swell So today's well is going to be in recent controversy with no pershrama case so some people might you know feel offended but I'm not doing anything other than stating facts what really happened because most of the people don't even know what really happened so I'm trying to inform them there of what happened I'll give you a little background of nuclear napushama is a very well educated woman she has a 37 year old lawyer who was the official BJP spokesperson used to appear on these TV debates night after night and she is also a student at Delhi University she was a student of law at Denny University and also she has done her Masters in international business law from the London School Law of Economics and she's the person who fought against although lost but her election camp is very evident coming back to the controversy that what happened So this was a debate on Times now about the Hindu claim that it is made on Hindu ground the mosque and there was some temple kind of thing which was destroyed by Orange and this mosque was built so the debate was going on this topic the Hindus claim that there was a Shivling the other side says that it was not a Shivling but what accounting and the opposition in that debate started to make fun of Shivling that is when Lupus Sharma got enriched and her words were like and she stated the exact section I know what it is she stated the exact chapters and pages in the Quran and she clearly mentioned of how Prophet had married a six year old girl named Ayesha and consummated her when she was nine years old she just stated facts nothing else and this thing was over this clip was shared by some Mohammed Zuba I don't know who he is but he's somewhat really popular he shared only the small slip and it went viral now there are protests all over the place you would have seen this on the news and people I don't know why are they creating such an issue over a thing?
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 2:37
Whatever she said, I felt it all was right. Then why is there so much of hatred against her? People are saying they'll kill her there's hungry for her head. One, Carol, two, Carol, Al Qaeda is giving threats. People all over the world are saying that she's wrong. Very few people are supporting her. Try and answer my question. My question is what did she do wrong?
I really think and I can guarantee that there are people who don't know anything about what actually she said or she didn't. But people are just, you know, used to create the so they're just picking the site, not listening to the past, but listening to the people who are manipulating things. So I think people should just see the fact that
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 0:45
I am sorry. Hi there. Thanks for replying to as well and I completely agree with you. You know, most of the people don't even know what she said. She they don't know if she mean they don't know that word. They just know that she says something against our religion and that is it charged the bullets on her. So those people who are listening to only these big religion based leaders and they don't know anything
Saksham Hooda
@sakshamhooda · 5:00
Hello. I just hired you as well. It reminded me of a proverb which stated the man who doesn't read is as equal and as poor to a man who cannot read you before actually discussing whether what she said was a fact or not which I will address later. First of all, as you said that she's an educated lady and whatnot? First of all, we need to think that getting educated and when getting educated is all about getting a degree
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 4:55
And a well educated person, I believe, is someone who can speak fluently, write fluently, or speak fluently and express emotions fluently. I think that is the person who is realistic. And coming on to your second point, I was thinking in a broader perspective of why is this all happening? Well, I'll ask you something. Why do these news people give news at all? What are the earning of it? They're hitting good kiarp, right?
Varun Aich
@varunkaich · 0:50
Debates, emotions, any logic. So the mistake that she did was she spoke ill about some other religion. I mean, she has the right to defend our religion. She has a completely anybody has the right. In fact, I can go and defend some other religion also. That's the reason why she's facing a fire. You can defend a religion, but just to defend you put others down. That is not right. I so that's the mistake that she did
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 1:54
She did flow away with emotions, but then whatever she said was not wrong at all. I don't think there should be so much violence just because she said something which is written by their people only and the Molanas have confirmed it. So it is not something which is wrong. So I think yeah, that's what I think. Why do you thanks for replying again and keep listening to my spouse. Goodbye
Varun Aich
@varunkaich · 2:11
Hey, Raghav. So allow me to just explain it again. I think there is some miscommunication. I never said that she's I mean, see, right or wrong, you and I cannot decide. You know, we are not at that. And, you know, even if we can I mean, yes, we can give her opinion, but who are we to decide right and wrong? But we know high level parameters and guidelines. Okay, so something done. Everything is situation
Because we Hindus have no unity among us. If anyone showing a finger towards their religion or their culture there are voice rest from every corner of the word. But the same things happen against Hinduism. No one is doing anything. No one is saying a single word. Even the Hindus themselves are doing disrespectful acts, pretty shameful acts because they are targeting our culture
Hello Varun. I listened to your reply to Raghav's swell about Napusharma controversy. You are saying that she said something wrong about the Prophet Muhammad a month but she did not say anything. She did not made anything up. She only stated what is packed and what is written on their Varun Shari. Then why are they making a fuss about it? You are saying the context of it but the context is not even a deal
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 2:36
Hi there. Thanks for replying again. Well, you know, I think it's a group of five W's, right? So I think the five W's have been answered quite properly. And I'll do that for you. So what she said was I'm not saying right or wrong, but the thing she said was factual. Do you agree with me or not?
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 1:59
But the thing is, right now I feel whatever she said was absolutely right. The thing you said that if they are not able to accept what is written in the Quran, if they're not able to accept the truth, then you can't you know, how do you even believe that? How can you even trust that these people have faith in their own religion? How can you believe that these people have faith in their religion?
Hi Ragoth. Thank you for responding. From whatever content I have seen on social media, Hindus are really supporting her. And it's a high time that Hindus unite. I think that secularism is not going to demolish Hinduism anymore. We will not let him. I will do whatever it is required to protect my religion, because I am a proud Sonata Harmy. And I will do whatever I can to protect my religion. And we will not. Hindus will not let secularism destroy our religion anymore
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 1:53
Even though there are many Muslims or many people opposed the so called liberals opposed to completely support secularism. What I feel in India is secularism is not secularism. It is basically Hindu phobia. These people who are so called themselves, so called secular, they're not really secular. They're all like, no, we won't support Hinduism because we are secular. We only support Muslims. And that is why we are going to be biased with them because we're secular
Neeraj Anchan
@neerajanchan · 4:46
Yes, there was a point where trade and relations along with a very big number of people living in those countries where at stake but in the end I think countries are known for the kind of standard they take and if this current government is giving us a clear picture about what they stand for they should have stood for it
Saksham Hooda
@sakshamhooda · 4:48
So any educated person, a well educated person, whichever definition you use, at least he needs to apply some consciousness that why is this even happening at all? Why are these useless debates taking place like a moron? So that needs to be discussed. Also, again, I am saying that whatever shish is not mentioned in Quran, it is mentioned in some hadith and there are disputes. Some say that prophet consummated her at age six. He consumed with her at it
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 3:09
And the problem is and what thing you said about Islam that you cannot say anything about against Islam because they unify. These people unify and then attack. And that is the reason. That is the point I love about the religion Islam that all the people who follow Islam are really have strong faith and do follow and would do anything for their religion. But we Hindus, I don't think we can ever unify because first of all, there's so many costs
Sports TV
@Priyanshu_98 · 2:31
In one of the rally I have seen and I have asked few people what was actually told by Nupur Sharma case. Of the people in that rally most of the people what I can say all the people because only I found one to two of them of the leader or anything they actually know what had happened to Nupur Sharma. It is the case in Diamondhammer. When I was going to one of my relatives house I found there's a big rally and I found most of the Muslim community people
Tanishka Singh
@Tancy_0818 · 5:00
That was one of the rude comments I think. Was there another thing, most of Muslim mosques are made from destroying a lot of the Hindu temples. I don't think it's that person's fault sitting over there or the fault of a lot of people involved in this religion. And she just commented a lot on their religion. And she also talked about flying horses, that they should just sit on the flying horse and go away like something they have in their religion. I'm not well aware
Tanishka Singh
@Tancy_0818 · 4:31
I don't see why this still needs to be a discussion. Yeah, maybe there was a Shibling there, but that doesn't mean we will fight over religion. We will comment on each other's religions. We're just making it worse. There isn't I just feel like that's just so bad. Like for no reason. It just happens for no reason
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 2:36
Why would news channel show something that the audience does not want to watch? Okay? So if a new channel opens up new news channel opens up, okay? So they'll first experiment with what kind of news, what kind of news are people really want to watch? And with most experiments, people found out that debates are the thing that most people want to watch. Otherwise, people like Swami are smart enough to switch over to normal news other than debates
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 1:00
So these people also are not thinking of benefit of people and not thinking of religion, they're just thinking of gaining votes as as this means yeah, that was it by the time for replying. And keep listening to myself because
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 0:17
Hi there. I am for replying. Sorry in interrupt, but whatever you said was exactly my point. And thank you for stating all these facts and helping me, you know, reply to one of the thank you
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 4:10
But at that time, but in that situation, I feel it was right. You know why? Because people insult Hindu. Many people insult Hinduism, Hindu religion openly. And I, for an eye is the thing. And it really is what matters. Because we can't always stay silent on this issue. We can't always be the ones who will suffer
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 2:48
Hi there. Thanks for replying home as well. Well, you said that she just a second. You know, I completely agree with you. You know, from fighting over something that was destroyed a long time ago isn't really a worth of time. Even I don't understand why people are fighting over if there was a shivling and that has been destroyed by orangze you can't really do anything about it. Right? And I think the problem doesn't stay right there
Krish Sehrawat
@KrishSeh511 · 0:37
You are pretty right in this. Well, that people do state that she is wrong, but they themselves don't know what was the case and I'm actually one of them. I mean, I don't don't like state around, not until now. But I do like verma new about the whole topic which got the news from yours, which I'm very thankful to. So yeah, thank you for this great twelve which provided an explanation to me of what is the case. Thank you
Raghav Katta
@Raghavkatta · 0:44
Hi there. Thanks for replying to me as well. Well, you know, that's what that is the reason I made this way in the first place. Because I wanted I knew that many of the people even I foam, for instance, I didn't know what really happened. But then I searched into it. And then I thought that whatever I searched, I should share this information